Presby University Community

"Resources are not, they become"...can someone help me out with this statement..?

what!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

well, well,finally i think i knw sumtin u dnt knw.

well...educate me then...i'm waiting...kernells

"Resource are not , they become...."

Wow?!
well lets take a critical look at resources from the Natu point of view,

"Resource are not resoueces, they become resources only when they support life on earth..."

"Resource are not always tangible, they become intangible when they are human resources...."

"Resource are not all renewable, they become extinct with time...."

"Resource are not ever artificial , they become refined or transformed (after all artificial stuff r made from natural stuff anyway)...."

Generally,

"Resource are not that eassy to come by, they become a bit of a nuisance when the are in abundance...."

How abt that, Elelart....?!

Ok that was quite a multidimensional explanation...but i think it's due to the way i presented the comment.

ok i meant this one "Resources are not resources, the become resources"
Your first point given was ok but too short, could you elaborate further on that point from a natu perspective...and probably conclude it in a socio-economic sense
...your points raised were interesting

Yes i agree with your statement is that resources are not they produce by a human.

Resources are definitely not produced by humans at the first few stages, humans just need to take a very good care of those resources though. Humans are the ones destroying all the natural resources, since the very evolution of the human scenario, and now Humans are like 'go green'. Isn't this too late to replace the natural geography of earth with some fake rocks after the damage has already been done?? Even though humans are on their mission to save the Earth now, it is humans who created situations like these.
regards,
Gwen